Obama's Army Reports For Duty

Memo to John McCain: be afraid, be very afraid.

WaPo reports on the 3,600 Obama volunteers, culled from a pool of 10,000 applicants, that have been dispatched throughout the country for six weeks of training.

Moving to harness the grass-roots energy that helped win the Democratic nomination, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign will deploy 3,600 volunteers in 17 states this weekend, each committed to six consecutive weeks of full-time political work.

The project, launched two months before the senator from Illinois became the presumptive nominee, is a measure of his determination to out-organize Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in states that could swing a close election.

The campaign put out word in April about "Obama Organizing Fellowships," an approach that went well beyond the "y'all come" model of luring volunteers with free doughnuts for two-hour canvassing stints. Supporters were required to answer essay questions, supply references and go through a telephone interview with campaign staff members.

In return for a promise to give the campaign at least six weeks of their lives, they were promised training in community organizing techniques.

Marc Ambinder reports that much of their time will be spent on registering voters as well as hosting thousands of United For Change events around the country.

As described in an e-mail from deputy campaign manager Steve Hilderband:

"In all 50 states, supporters like you -- seasoned veterans and first-time volunteers alike -- will host house meetings with the express purpose of reaching out and bringing together folks who supported all of the Democratic candidates (and those who are just tuning into the process now)."

These house meetings form the core of the campaign's organizing model. The concept derives from organizing theory as taught by Saul Alinsky and as adopted by community organizers across the country. Never before has a major party presidential campaign used them to expand their support in a general election.

It's no accident, of course, that the philosophy behind this type of organizing echoes that of Howard Dean's Neighborhood Volunteer program:

Research alone shows that talking with voters face-to-face is more persuasive than TV advertising, direct mail or phone calls. For our Democratic candidates to win, we need to go to our neighbors, knock on their doors and ask for their vote. To accomplish this, we are launching an effort in communities across the country called the Neighborhood Volunteer program. We are recruiting activists like you who commit to talk to 25 neighbors at least three times between now and Election Day. By Labor Day, we need 500,000 activists like you to pledge to be a Neighborhood Volunteer.

It. Is. On.



Display:


It IS on. (2.00 / 2)

Like Donkey Kong.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 05:31:07 PM EST

Saul Alinsky (none / 0)

didn't hillary write an essay on him? can we read it now?


His head is bowed. He thinks of men and kings. Yea, when the sick world cries, how can he sleep?
by RisingTide on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 05:38:11 PM EST

Re: Saul Alinsky (none / 0)

Didn't she actually write an essay critical of Alinsky?


by animated on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 06:15:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Saul Alinsky (none / 0)

yup. She called his methods "anachronistic"

Can you imagine?


by rapcetera on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:22:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 1)

Yes!!!

(fistbump)


Unseen, in the background, Fate was quietly slipping the lead into the boxing glove.
by fogiv on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 05:42:44 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 2)

yeah I got invited to one of the house parties next,next weekend; by like my 'friendy neighborhood Obama supporter'


lalaa.
"Rankles and Rush Limbaugh, ruining the chaos brand since 2008."
by alyssa chaos on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 05:43:24 PM EST

If this election isn't a landslide.. (2.00 / 2)

..I will weep for my country.

Even if you consider the comparison of the candidates a wash. The level of organization and enthusiasm is so staggeringly divergent that if all these Whos can't reach the Grinchs' hearts then I no longer have hope for our nation.


Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win. ~ Sun Tzu
by Tumult on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 06:25:59 PM EST

Re: If this election isn't a landslide.. (2.00 / 1)

Exactly. Especially when you consider that much of the GOP organizing strength (Evangelicals etc)isn't exactly enthusiastic about McCain.


by conspiracy on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 06:33:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If this election isn't a landslide.. (none / 0)

There isn't enthusiasm right now, but it's still early.

You may want to dismiss McCain, but do NOT dismiss the Republican Party and its members.


by stefystef on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 08:06:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If this election isn't a landslide.. (2.00 / 1)

I dont dismiss them, but just like Clinton they are being caught flat footed at the start of the race.  By the time the GOP mobilizes any real response, it may be too late.

Like the article mentioned, this plan has been in the works for months.  Heck, I even have evangelical Republicans who are considering voting for Obama.  Believe it or not the Wright thing actually convinced them Obamas WAS a Christian and was being persecuted.  What a weird kind of reverse psychology.


by tlhwraith on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 12:02:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If this election isn't a landslide.. (none / 0)

DUH. It's insane that Republicans think attacking a minister, a CHRISTIAN minister, is okay. ESPECIALLY an attack for political reasons. By the time they've tried to frantically keep hammering this thing in the fall, they will have legions of disillusioned Christians. Because at some point, they'll harass the church so much that it will become an issue of freedom of religion. Not to mention that churches don't exactly like being told what they can and can't say when it comes to politics.


If you're being chased by an angry bull and then you notice you're also being chased by a swarm of bees, it doesn't really change things. Just keep on running.
by vcalzone on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 09:45:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

especially with Supreme Court seats at stake n/t (none / 0)


by chiefscribe on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 02:00:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 6)

While the Old Guard DLC "Lose 36" crowd was scoffing at Dean and his winning innovations, Obama and his people were learning from him.

And that's why he'll wipe the floor with McLobbyist.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 06:40:34 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

I am sooooo going to start using this!

McLobbyist.


by IsThisSnarkFan on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:37:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's the best name EVER for parody because... (2.00 / 1)

you can put "Mc" in front of ANYTHING.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:49:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's the best name EVER for parody because... (none / 0)

McSweeeeeet


Democrat for the democratic nominee
by KLRinLA on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:57:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's the best name EVER for parody because... (none / 0)

McHardyHarHar


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 08:00:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

Unforntunately we were talking "win win" in the last two election. Before writing McCain off would remind you that GOPers are great field organizers and nothing has changed.


by joliepoint on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 06:46:47 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 3)

Obama's ground game cannot be compared to Kerry's. We are already making plans for canvassing/GOTV in my small town.
by parahammer on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:23:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I hope there's some sort of organized effort (none / 0)

to get these volunteers some food and financial assistance where needed.


_____________
PUMA: Perverse Undemocratic McCain Adherents
by lizardbox on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:06:02 PM EST

Re: I hope there's some sort of organized effort (2.00 / 3)

Voulunteers are housing and feeding 200 fellows in NC. They will be taken care of.
by parahammer on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:24:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I hope there's some sort of organized effort (none / 0)

At no cost to the Obama campaign because it's volunteers.

Thats how Obama was able to keep spending down.  By getting people to give their time and services to him with little cost to his organization.

And by getting volunteers, you are getting the most faithful and most devoted followers to preach "the word".


by stefystef on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 08:01:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I hope there's some sort of organized effort (2.00 / 2)

Actually it's an in-kind contribution and you have to fill out a contribution form for the value of the items you donate.
by parahammer on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 05:44:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Todd (none / 0)

I just want to say that I am appreciative for the chance to read your writing.  I have learned a lot about keeping things readable.

I'll still read you, but I am leaving (for a while?) due to my actions last night.  I was better than them and I hope to be able to prove it with my work else where.

A million kudos to you for your work.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:31:24 PM EST

interesting question (none / 0)

As Obama's campaign grows by orders of magnitude, could be actually end up having had more people work for him at one point in the campaign than the total number of appoints/exempt employees the transition team will fill?

Also, could he end up with more donors than Nader voters?


Bob Brigham Blog
by Bob Brigham on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:31:31 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 4)

ah wrong place troll gem...
yer blues
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAvlYLCYO DU&feature=related
I'll leave it to he admin's

meanwhile...
via openleft
"In an email to people accepted into their Organizing Fellowship Program, the Obama camp listed the 17 states below as the ones where they need the most resources:

Colorado
Florida
Georgia
Iowa
Michigan
Missouri
North Carolina
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
Nevada
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Virginia
Washington
Wisconsin"

"Every District, Every State"...Dr. Howard Dean


"harlequin speech of suicide, demanding instantaneous lobotomy"
by nogo postal on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:33:19 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

""Every District, Every State"...Dr. Howard Dean"

A good idea.  Method matters though.  And remember, Dean lost.


by shellius on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:44:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Dean reformed the party. (2.00 / 2)

All this is possible because of his strategy.

We are going to take our country back.


John McCain, maverick
by lojasmo on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 11:27:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

Dean lost because he was not the best at speeches. It had nothing to do with his campaign style.


If you're being chased by an angry bull and then you notice you're also being chased by a swarm of bees, it doesn't really change things. Just keep on running.
by vcalzone on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 09:49:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

Thanks, I was wondering which states. Obama seems well-positioned to compete well in all of the battleground states - a great sign.


by JD Lasica on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 04:36:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

I'm surprised to not see South Carolina on the list.


If you're being chased by an angry bull and then you notice you're also being chased by a swarm of bees, it doesn't really change things. Just keep on running.
by vcalzone on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 09:48:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

Just got an e-mail from my local county chair in OR asking if I could host one of these folks (unfortunately I can't) but I'm glad to see that just Washington County is getting 12-15 I've heard.


by skywaker9 on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 07:59:51 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

The tidal wave is building...


by liberalj on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 09:08:37 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 2)

Is there going to be another wave of recruiting and training or are they all done now?  Because I wasn't an Obama supporter until he won the nomination but now I want to help etc.


Yes, I'm aware there's a possible misogynist reading of the myth. Sorry.
by Endymion on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 09:47:00 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 1)

YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHH


by Bobby Obama on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 09:47:05 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 1)

as an old community organizer I'm pleasantly surprised to see this going on so early. This may not only win it may change the whole damn world like Obama says it will!


by cacamp on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:20:59 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 1)

I'm running the sign war for Obama in Prince William County, VA.  I've instructed my interns to post up 5 signs for every John McCain sign that's out there.  We're aiming to get yard signs in front of every house, especially in neighborhoods that get a lot of traffic.  


by Steve24 on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:41:44 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

This is both creepy and cool.

However, I have to warn Obama soldiers to not bug people too much. It could cause unexpected blowback.  I remember when Howard Dean's orange-hatted student brigade hit Iowa heavily before the primary in 2004, -- they thought it was useful, but instead, the onslaught scared Iowans and turned them off. They didn't like the "outsiders" telling them how to think.

No one likes to be strong-armed or manipulated or to feel forced to support someone. Tread lightly Obama soldiers, focus on policy. People are smart and they don't want to be lied to or pushed.  Don't Howard-Deanize this too much.


by shellius on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 10:42:59 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

Actually, most people aren't smart at all in this country.  We have a long history of pack-mentality thinking and I would suspect the big problem with what you described is that the pack felt put upon.  That's not a sign of intelligence at all.

I know some of the recruits and from how they were trained the "hard sell" approach isn't really part of it.  In fact, a large part of the training was in making people feel relaxed and open.


by tlhwraith on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 12:07:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (2.00 / 1)

You do realize that the whole basis of this process is to avoid having strangers visit your house. The point is to have people who already know you work to get your support.

This is what Karl Rove did so effectively in 2004 with evangelicals.


by elrod on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 01:41:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Exactly.... (none / 0)

The GOP is salivating at the idea of a bunch of kids in birkenstocks showing up in suburbia, just scaring people more than they already are....Mrs.Obama, with her many grim and depressing speeches, has already turned people off and made them uneasy. The "Obama Army" will complete the task.

What middle America wants--and will vote for--is people who look and think like us.


by BJJ Fighter on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 01:56:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't think you get it. (none / 0)

The idea behind these organizing fellows is not that they'll be doing all the work themselves.  The idea is that they'll be going to communities to assist local volunteers in registering voters, and getting lists of people ready for canvassing and getting out the vote in the fall.  For instance, in my county there will probably be a couple paid staff, a half dozen organizing fellows, and several thousand (maybe close to 10 even) local volunteers.


by jimotto on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 08:34:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

"Be afraid".....Are you kidding? (none / 0)

The "Barack Bounce" is about 6-8 points, in most polls. If I were an Obama supporter, that's what I would be afraid about. Folks, think about it:

--I grew up in the '70's, and can barely remember the Watergate Scandal. But most people would agree--based on special elections in LA, MS, and IL--that the GOP this year is in worse shape today than they were then. Between Iraq and the economy, this should be their worst nightmare.

--The Republican nominee is a cross between Wilford Brimley and Colonel Sanders.

--In years past (try 2004 and 1988), the Democratic nominee was up +15 points at this point in the cycle. With gas at $4 per gallon, this race shouldn't even be close.

So instead of making silly remarks like "be afraid", ask why the presumptive Democratic nominee isn't showing signs of a blowout.

In other words, maybe it's our Democratic Party that should "be afraid"....this is beginning to feel like the years when we had McGovern, Dukakis, and Kerry as our nominees. If President Reagan were here today, he would just smile, shake his head, and then scold us, "there you go again".


by BJJ Fighter on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 01:33:25 AM EST

Re: "Be afraid".....Are you kidding? (none / 0)

Simple: Much of the public thinks John McCain is different than other Republicans. When they learn about John McCain's real record, and not his media-created "maverick" image, they will side with Obama. Look at how many people think McCain is pro-choice on abortion.


by elrod on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 01:43:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

And what do you think is going to happen... (none / 0)

once the GOP goes to work on Obama, and "Michelle"? Four years ago, I was told by Kerry partisans that the Swift Boat stuff was old news, and that America had moved beyond that! It would make no difference...Bob Shrum decided that it would be best to "stay above the fray".

The sight of a black minister shrieking "God Damn America"....which then pans to a picture of the Democratic nominee with his arm around said minister....is what GOP consultants describe as a "Gold Mine". Kerry slinging his medals over the White House fence happened 30 years ago...this Rev.Wright stuff is current.

So...to use the author's words...be afraid.


by BJJ Fighter on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 01:50:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And what do you think is going to happen... (none / 0)

Difference between then and now..... First, Obama hasn't stayed "out of the fray". He's been in it consistently and will be moreso now that he has to get in the mud with the likes of the GOP strategists. Secondly, you seem to think there are voters that are unaware or don't remember that issue. And in that respect, you are wrong. The polls reflect the extent of the damage that issue will do.


If you're being chased by an angry bull and then you notice you're also being chased by a swarm of bees, it doesn't really change things. Just keep on running.
by vcalzone on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 09:56:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And what do you think is going to happen... (none / 0)

Keep wishing for a Democratic defeat. Keep waiting for Obama's campaign to implode. Keep underestimating the Obama campaign. So far you have been right 0% of the time.

But if predicting imminent doom makes you feel better. Knock yourself out. It's going to be a tough  November for you.


by hankg on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 10:41:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "Be afraid".....Are you kidding? (none / 0)

"In years past (try 2004 and 1988), the Democratic nominee was up +15 points at this point in the cycle."

You might ditch the claim that kerry was ever up by 15% over Bush, for the simple reason that IT'S NOT TRUE.  In June of 2004, Bush v. Kerry was polled 18 times - Bush led in 12 of those polls, Kerry in 5 (1 was a tie).  Kerry's largest lead?  6%, not even half the 15% you falsely claim.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Preside ntial_04/bush_vs_kerry_historical.html

"With gas at $4 per gallon, this race shouldn't even be close."

How about 1980?  Sure, gas wasn't as bad as it is now but it was still at $2.50 in 2008 dollars and the economy was completely in the tank with Carter very unpopular.  

Hint - Reagan didn't lead in a single poll until October.  

The public didn't know him but once they got familiar with him he closed the deal.  Obama is way, way ahead of Reagan's pace.


by Collideascope on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 08:56:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I remember Ronald Reagan. (none / 0)

I voted for Ronald Reagan.

Barack is no Ronald Reagan.


by BJJ Fighter on Sun Jun 15, 2008 at 03:09:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

I'm glad to read upthread the Obama campaign is looking
 at Nevada. I just got here but Maclames internals must look bad here cause he's droppin a lot of ad time here. I think Richardson as veep would seal Nevada Arizona, Colorado and New Mexico. Of course Clinton would do the same for Ohio and Penn, and help in VA.  
Because I wont trade humanity for patriotism!
by Drewid on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 05:59:19 AM EST

McCain't - Be afraid be very afraid (none / 0)

The game has changed, the ttraditional G.O.P. smear and fear tactics have lost their power. The Republicans will try to dribble a basketball up the feild for a touchdown this Fall.

It won't work.


McCain's occupation plan will achieve victory when it bestows liberty to the freedom loving people of Iraq and their freedom loving oil.
by Lefty Coaster on Sat Jun 14, 2008 at 12:37:06 PM EST

Re: Obama's Army Reports For Duty (none / 0)

"
Obama's ground game cannot be compared to Kerry's."
Right.
Flashlights rc heli videogame
by blueskyadf on Sat Jun 21, 2008 at 04:39:18 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.