Wes Clark on MSNBC tonight (6/30) and GMA tomorrow (7/1)

by kevin22262, Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:19:33 PM EST

Cross posted at EENR

Taken from Wes Clark's site. He does not shy away from a fight!
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/

MEDIA ALERT! 6/30/08 - MSNBC with Dan Abrams on MSNBC TONIGHT!, Monday, June 30 @ 9:00PM EDT / 8:00PM CDT

General Clark will appear with Dan Abrams on MSNBC TONIGHT!, Monday, June 30 @ 9:00PM EDT / 8:00PM CDT

9:00 PM EDT | 8:00 PM CDT | 7:00 PM MDT | 6:00 PM PDT

All appearance times are subject to change. We suggest tuning in at the top of the show.

General Clark will also appear Tuesday morning on ABC's Good Morning America. See:http://securingamerica.com/node/3001 for details
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/




Tags: Wes Clark, media (all tags)

Display:
Permalink :: 10 Comments :: Post a Comment


What do you think (2.00 / 1)

he will have to say?


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:24:11 PM EST

Re: What do you think (2.00 / 1)

The chances of him apologizing to McCain is 1%; I think he takes the argument right back to McCain.  I've speculated that Clark may have a personal issue with McCain (has McCain made statements about how he led the troops in Kosovo?) and that his harsh indictment of McCain stemmed from a little bit of personal animus.

What is interesting is whether he will point out that Obama did not stand up for him.  I completely discount the notion that Obama put him up to it because he was a Hillary person until the end, barely knows Obama, and had to know that the media would have its knives out for him and that Obama would throw him under a bus.


by Blazers Edge on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:31:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What do you think (2.00 / 1)

I think he stays away from the personal and goes RIGHT AT McCain's judgement on Iraq?

But, I disagree, he's not going to go back at Obama, hell, I think there is a lot of wink-wink-nod-nod going on?

Obama didn't throw him under the bus, and he knows it.

But, Blazers Edge, as a Clinton'ite, you see this 180 degrees different then I?

I think this is a plus-plus for BOTH Obama and Clark, being played just like it has been.

I'm just in disagreement with all the concern diaries here, this is playing EXACTLY HOW the Obama campaign wants it.

Now, Obama doesn't have to defend or deny anything Wes says, and Wes can go Mano Y Mano with McCain.

And, everyone that says this leaves Wes out for VP is crazy IMHO.

The VP HAS to carry the fight, hell, if Wes can get McCain in some kind of back and forth, he's proven his worth to Obama AND the party as the VP!

I think Wes is a great choice, NATO commander is like being the CEO of a small country?

He's a Southern born and bred, and would play all through the midwest.

Let's see how this plays out?

Maybe he is freelancing, maybe not?

Anyway, IF he gets the McCain camp to engage, it's strictly a win win for the Democrats.


Our long national nightmare is over...in 17 days!
by WashStateBlue on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:40:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What do you think (2.00 / 1)

As a fellow Washingtonian, I disagree with you brother.  Clark's comments dominated the airwaves today and took away from the main parts of Obama's patriotism speech.  If this was all orchestrated for Obama to look "above it all," I think it failed also; the media didn't really give Obama "credit" for throwing Clark overboard.

McCain's camp is not letting up too; they are using Clark's statement to attack Obama.  The Obama and Clinton blogosphere is also roasting Obama.  In essense, the day was a total loss for Obama in my opinion; he gets attacked from the right and the left while the middle won't give him "credit" for "honoring" McCain by throwing Clark under the bus.


by Blazers Edge on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:45:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

As a fellow (none / 0)

Washingtonian ... I disagree with you.

Clark helped bring up the question of what makes you qualified to be Commander in Chief. It probably brought attention to Obama's speech. Now people privately may ask themselves... "does getting shot down and being a POW make you a leader?"

Wes Clark IS a leader. John Kerry was/is a leader.  I hope Obama can also be a true leader!


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:54:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What do you think (2.00 / 0)

"The Obama and Clinton blogosphere is also roasting Obama."

No, they're not. We have the PUMA crowd going ape-sh*t and posting numerous identical concern diaries?

The roasting is being done by folks who wake up in the morning trying to figure out how to roast Obama, I.E, Pissed off Clinton supporters.


Our long national nightmare is over...in 17 days!
by WashStateBlue on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 08:06:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McCain didn't take the bait (2.00 / 2)

He didn't attack Clark; he used Clark's statements to attack Obama.

Perhaps if Clark continues to engage him, McCain will come back stronger against Clark.  If it's McCain v. Clark, then Obama is on better footing.  Right now, McCain's camp is trying to blame Obama and I think, they are succeeding because nobody has Obama's back right now.


by Blazers Edge on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:52:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama's reaction (none / 0)

I have to say that although the brawler in me wished Obama would have come out and clearly supported Clark, the realist knows that he played this correctly. If he would have fanned the flames, this would be a week long story, and I hate to say this but I don't trust the American public to understand or figure out the context of the interview. Instead it will turn into "Obama demeaned McCain's period as a POW! What an anti American hater!!"

Instead this will be a one or two day story and we can get back to talking about how McCain will lead this country into a prolonged economic depression. Let's look at the big picture. I think most of the criticism from our side is coming from Clinton supporters who see this as yet another slap in the face of someone closely associated with the Clinton's. Let's be perfectly honest, what do you think Hillary's response would have been if she won the nomination and Tony McPeak made the same comments?


by highgrade on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 07:51:49 PM EST

Starting to think... (2.00 / 1)

This might not be accidental. Wesley Clark's statement to the press doesn't mention Obama. Obama disavowed these comments immediately, but all it takes is for Wesley Clark to throw himself out there and keep raising those questions about McCain for the story to take hold. Obama can say that he doesn't speak for him and that he respects McCain's leadership, and McCain gets in an angry pissing contest with an equally well-respected military veteran. At best, it becomes an all-out assault on a general.

Wow... If this WAS done purposefully, it's pretty clever. McCain could be tied up talking about this for at least the next week.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 08:38:49 PM EST

Ever watch The West Wing? (2.00 / 1)

You will see that on occasion these "gaffes" are done purposely for a reason.

I remember on a few episodes there was a preplanned gaffe where a cabinet member will say something controversial and then apologize, knowing he/she said something controversial just to get people talking about the issue.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 12:19:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.

Login
Username:

Password: